German-dominated Europe to take out Iran for Jerusalem?

Security Fears Behind Joint German-Israeli Cabinet Meeting
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

(IsraelNN.com) The threat of a nuclear Iran to regional security is at the top of the agenda in a historic meeting Monday between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Angela Merkel and their respective cabinets in Berlin.

Merkel said at a joint press conference that time is running out to impose severe sanctions on Iran in an effort to prevent it from becoming a nuclear power.

It is the first time the two governments have met together on German soil and follows by several months last year’s first-ever joint meeting in Israel. Germany officials noted that the country rarely holds joint cabinet sessions except with countries with which it has very close relations. Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman (Yisrael Beiteinu) and Defense Minister Ehud Barak were among the leading Israeli ministers to attend.

Click here to continue

************
If Iran persists in their proud and stubborn ways, if they harden their heart against all reason, Iran will provoke the EU to contain the situation to keep Israel restrained. The EU rapid response to Iran's nuclear jihad will be a new crusade.


As the United States called upon Israel to become their virtual protectorate during Operation Desert Storm, the European Union will offer Israel guarantees of peace and security. Europe, not the overextended and highly inflated United States, will take out Iran.

However, even as the United States later pressured Israel to go to murderous Madrid as repayment and begin the lying "peace process," the European Union will expect to deploy "peacekeeping" troops in and around Jerusalem as a buffer zone and enforce the accursed UN Resolution 181.

Jerusalem is in danger of becoming the capital of Europe's Crusader Kingdom. The German-Jesuit EU will defeat Iran for Jerusalem. As Isaiah 29:1 laments: "Woe to Ariel, Ariel, the City where David dwelt!"

Europe to take out Iran for Jerusalem

Anticipating a Coup (Iran)

Newsletter 2009/06/22
German-Foreign-Policy.com

In spite of explicit warnings, German organizations are trying to escalate the internal power struggles in Iran. The state-financed Deutsche Welle radio station is one of the foreign broadcasters, whose Farsi-language program is firing the protesters on, with hourly reports on reactions from the west. Party-affiliated foundations, including the German Free Democratic Party (FDP) -affiliated Friedrich Naumann Foundation are offering their partnership to those opposing the central structures of Iran's government. After initial hesitations, the German Foreign Ministry has also begun to openly intervene in the domestic affairs of a fellow UN member nation, making "demands" on the government of a sovereign country. Over the weekend, the chancellery also assumed the position of a challenging partisan in the Iranian domestic power struggles. German press organs are indulging in blood-lecherous anticipation of the "chaos in Teheran." Every intervention in the current power struggles is "highly detrimental," assessed Bahman Nirumand an expert on Iran. It makes the protest demonstrators appear to be "guided by the West, their leaders will be branded as collaborators." Indeed, the current support for the Iranian opposition is essentially motivated by foreign policy objectives. As long as the West had its Shah regime in power in Teheran, the Iranian movement for democracy was repressed, in a bloodbath, with western help.

Over the weekend representatives of the government in Berlin issued numerous statements intended to teach the Iranian government how to behave democratically. The Iranian ambassador was summoned to the Foreign Ministry, in a colonial hegemonic manner. The Iranians are rejecting this interference and threatening to break diplomatic relations with Berlin. Still, German organizations close to the government are continuing unabated their activities, fanning domestic protests in Iran. Among the main perpetrators of foreign seditious propaganda are the official German foreign radio station, the Deutsche Welle and several German party-affiliated foundations....

Click here to continue

Study: Iran to Attack US, Israel

Study: Iran to Attack US, Israel
by Malkah Fleisher

Just two days after US President Barack Hussein Obama shared a controversial and landmark handshake with Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez at the Summit of the Americas, the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center has released a study analyzing the flowering alliance between the increasingly anti-Western Latin America and the virulently anti-Israel Iran.

The study was conducted at the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC), a non-governmental organization dedicated to Israeli intelligence and terrorism issues.

According to the study, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is using anti-Western Hugo Chavez as a springboard into several Latin American countries, such as Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador, where he intends to establish a religious, terrorist, political and economic foothold in South America. Iran has already made major inroads in its relationship with Venezuela and Bolivia, largely based on shared anti-American sentiments.

Iran will utilize this developing relationship to challenge the United States, parts of Asia, and Africa, said the study.

The Islamic Republic will also leverage petrodollars and Muslim operatives positioned throughout key Latin American countries to implement a radical anti-Western agenda, fight America's anti-nuclear policy, and to slash international economic sanctions according to the IICC.

In addition, the report warns that Iran may launch anti-American and anti-Israel terror attacks through intelligence and terror networks in South American countries.

Ahmadinejad, who hosted a "World Without Zionism" conference in 2005, promoting his goal to "wipe Israel off the map", has already succeeded in wounding Israeli diplomatic relations in the region, with Israel's diplomatic core being forced out of Chavez's Venezuela and Bolivia during the anti-terror Operation Cast Lead in January 2009.

Khomeini-inspired Shi'ite Islamic and Iranian revolutionary propaganda is being exported by Iran into non-Muslim and Muslim communities in Latin America, in large part through its terror proxy, Hizbullah, which is raising funds for operation by uniting with South American drug and crime cartels.

The IICC report cites several U.S. intelligence and military officials expressing concern over rising Iranian activity in Latin America, and increasing numbers of converts in the region to Islam.

Chavez and Obama exchanged a warm greeting on Friday, and again on Saturday, at which time Chavez presented Obama with a book on American and European imperialism in South America.

Chavez, who said being in Iran's capital city of Tehran made him feel "like arriving at one's own home", told reporters he shared a good moment with Obama, who he called "intelligent." The Venezuelan dictator once referred to former US President George W. Bush as "the devil" at a meeting of the United Nations.

Venezuela and Israel enjoyed a strong relationship in the past, with Venezuela voting in favor of Jewish statehood at the United Nations on November 27, 1947.

************

Both Nazis (from the German-dominated Europe) and Muslims work together against the United States from South and Central America.

Death to America: Major American Cities Targeted by Terrorists?
Will Providence permit foreign murderers in our midst (in attitude, if not yet in action) to unleash nuclear fires within our major cities? Will militant minorities work with them against us? Won't our British-Israelite brethren suffer the same within their respective biblical inheritances?

Europe to Take Out Iran For Jerusalem
As the United States called upon Israel to become their virtual protectorate during Operation Desert Storm, the European Union will offer Israel guarantees of peace and security. Europe, not the overextended and highly inflated United States, will take out Iran.

Is Germany Conquering Latin America?

Israel, US Urging Europe to Take Iranian Threat Seriously
Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) – Iran poses the “most serious and imminent threat to global security and stability,” Israeli prime minister said on Tuesday. Ehud Olmert also said economic and political sanctions must be “dramatically increased” to stop Iran from getting nukes.
*************

Europe to Take Out Iran For Jerusalem
As the United States called upon Israel to become their virtual protectorate during Operation Desert Storm, the European Union will offer Israel guarantees of peace and security. Europe, not the overextended and highly inflated United States, will take out Iran.

www.DavidBenAriel.org

Nukes and Nazi-Muslims, Israel and Iran

Israel should nuke Mecca to prove the Nazi-Muslim's moon god is nothing worth dying for and the Koran a bunch of hogwash.

However, the German-Jesuit Europe wants Israel to lay low to keep things "under control" and will take on Iran soon with their New Crusade.

Europe to Take Out Iran for Jerusalem

It doesn't have to be that way, but it's Iran's choice.

Israel, Iran, and Purim

The Book of Daniel, Islam, and Europe

Europe Misses the Mark - Will It Return as the Sign of the Cross?

Muslims Reject Moses and Jesus for Mohammad

Europe Swings Both Ways

The Intelligence Summit Misses the Mark: the German-Jesuit Threat to World Peace

Iran Hosting Conference on Enriching Culture of ‘Resistance’

Iran Hosting Conference on Enriching Culture of ‘Resistance’
Jerusalem (CNSNews.com)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday accused
“bullying powers” of creating terrorist groups and posing a threat
to mankind. In the past, he has frequently referred to the U.S.
as a “bullying power.”
*****************
God Save Us From Islam and Europe!
Europe to Take Out Iran for Jerusalem
Ehud Olmert Playing with German Fire
The German-EU Grows Restless Over Mideast Crisis
The Book of Daniel, Islam, and Europe
Call for Anglo-Israeli Alliance

EU raises pressure on Iran

EU raises pressure on Iran - 24.04.2007 -

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The EU has agreed to introduce tougher sanctions against Iran over its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment, seen by the West as a move towards having a nuclear bomb.

http://euobserver.com/9/23925/?rk=1

Europe and Iran are destined to have a deadly clash that will violently change the world and threaten the American, British and Jewish peoples in a nuclear flash.

Europe to Take Out Iran for Jerusalem

God Save Us From Islam and Europe!

The German-EU Grows Restless Over Mideast Crisis

Is Germany in Danger of Backsliding?

Europe Misses the Mark - Will It Return as the Sign of the Cross?

Is a World Dictator About to Appear?

The Book of Daniel, Islam, and Europe

EU to Conquer Anglo-Saxons and Jews

The Intelligence Summit Misses the Mark: the German-Jesuit Threat to World Peace

Iran May Be Fueling New Palestinian Missile War On Israel

From: Israel Resource News Agency

Subject: Fw: Phila Bulletin: Iran May Be Fueling New Palestinian Missile War On Israel

Iran May Be Fueling New Palestinian Missile War On Israel

David Bedein, The Philadelphia Bulletin: 04/19/2007

The British look to Germany to save them from Iran

Tony Blair conceded defeat some time ago for any proper British-Israelite response to Nazi-Muslim provocations. It appears the British, like the foolish Israelis, look to the German-EU to save them and then stab them in the back.

Europe to Take Out Iran for Jerusalem
God Save Us From Islam and Europe!
Ehud Olmert Playing with German Fire
Death to the American, British & Jewish Peoples?
EU to Conquer Anglo-Saxons and Jews

Purim, Purim, Purim!

Israel, Iran, and Purim

Death threats against Jews ultimately backfire as Purim teaches. Iran would do well to heed or suffer the consequences.

Purim: Rescind the Kahane Terrorist Classification!

The State Department's rash terrorist classification of Kahane discredits the United States and rewards terrorism. It's past time to right the wrong!

Professor Francisco Gil-White interviewed by "Argument"

INTERVIEW WITH NORWEGIAN MAGAZINE "ARGUMENT"

copyright (c) 2007 by Professor Francisco Gil-White
http://www.hirhome.com/

Reprinted with permission of the author
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/interview_argument.htm


Excerpt: "It turns out that, starting with Jimmy Carter, the U.S. began a secret program to arm this state that makes Saudi Arabia 'ultimately...the largest beneficiary of U.S. weapons sales in the entire world [and] one of the most heavily armed countries in the world'. [14] In other words, Israel is not the country getting the most weapons from the U.S. -- that title goes to Israel's mortal enemy Saudi Arabia".

YERUSHALIYIM, Israelite Tribal Territories of Judah and Benjamin, Kingdom of David and Solomon, United Israelite Kingdom of Judah and Joseph, Fifth Day, Eleventh Month ("Shvat"), 5767; Yom Revi'i (Fourth Day of the Week/"Wednes"-day, January 24, 2007), Root & Branch Information Services [mailto:rb@rb.org.il] [www.rb.org.il]:

Introduction:

Osmund Gjerde from the Norwegian magazine "Argument" recently interviewed me. The list of questions and answers turned out to be too much material, so we decided on the following solution: I would publish the full list of questions and answers here, and he would write an article for his magazine based on some of this material. Mr. Gjerde's article appears this coming February.

[Note from DBA - for purposes of brevity and personal emphasis I share question 9 and Professor Gil-White's answer]

9. Question:

Why would the U.S. want Iranian dominance in the Middle East? What proof do you have to support the claim that this is actually a goal for U.S. policy makers?

Answer:

Let's start with the evidence, and then move to the motivations. H.I.R. has a piece that summarizes the entire history of U.S. foreign policy toward Iran in order to put the 1991 Gulf War against Iraq in its proper geopolitical context. I will briefly repeat that summary here below. [42]

Before 1979 the U.S. had a policy to support the repressive, unequal, and totalitarian regime of Shah Reza Pahlavi. Most people believe that ever since 1979, when the Islamist regime replaced the Shah, the U.S. government has been an enemy of the new Iranian government. However, the facts suggest otherwise.

Immediately after the Ayatollah Khomeini succeeded in his coup d’etat against the Iranian Revolution (which had not been primarily Islamist), he provoked a war against Iraq. The Iranian military had been depleted in the revolutionary struggles and it was almost entirely U.S.-made, so Khomeini could not afford to provoke a war with Iraq unless he knew he was going to be supplied by the U.S.

And he was.

Though Khomeini and the Reagan administration exchanged dramatic insults in public, throughout the Iran-Iraq war the Reagan administration secretly supplied the Iranians with billions of dollars in U.S. weapons and spare parts every year.

When caught -- this was called "the Iran-Contra scandal" because the U.S. was simultaneously arming the Contra terrorists in Central America) -- the Reagan administration explained that it had been trying to get on Iran's good side in order to beg for Iranian influence on the Hezbollah terrorists who had taken some US citizens hostage in Lebanon.

This absurd explanation could not be true even in principle because the arms shipments began in 1981, as a Congressional investigation subsequently showed, and the first hostage in Lebanon was taken in 1982.

When the war ended badly for the Iranians in the 1988 cease fire, Zalmay Khalilzad, a big power, fretted out loud that year, and then again in 1989, that it was very bad for Iran to be weak relative to Iraq, and called for "strengthening Iran and containing Iraq".

The next year, in 1990, Khalilzad became Assistant Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning. The year after that, 1991, we had the Gulf War. This war destroyed Iraq. Thereafter the United States followed a policy of containing Iraq, which in turn strengthened Iraq's rival Iran, precisely as Khalilzad had recommended.

During the 1990s the U.S. Pentagon teamed up with the Iranian government to import tens of thousands of mujahedin "holy warriors" into Bosnia, so they would help out Alija Izetbegovic's other Muslim terrorists in the slaughter of innocent Serbs.

Recently, Iran helped out in the initial stages of the invasion of Iraq.

The greatest beneficiary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq (which everybody now agrees was probably not launched for the stated reasons) is...Iran. As The Guardian said, explaining the obvious:

"Iran is the true winner of that war. They only had to sit tight and smile as the West delivered on a golden plate all the influence Iran had always sought in the Middle East. The U.S. and its allies will soon be gone from Afghanistan and Iraq, leaving Iranian-backed Shias dominant in both countries, their influence well spread across Syria, a chunk of Saudi Arabia and other countries for decades to come. Historic Iranian ambitions have been fulfilled without firing a shot while the U.S. is reduced to fist-shaking. How foolish was that?" [43]

Foolish? That is one hypothesis. Another is that this is what the U.S. ruling elite wants. This latter hypothesis would be consistent with everything I summarize above, and with the reasonable assumption that the greatest power in history probably usually gets what it wants.

It is consistent also with the fact that the U.S. has not really tried to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons, despite the noise about it, and will obviously not attack Iran (something H.I.R. predicted back in February, 2006, when everybody was saying an attack against Iran was imminent). [44]

It is also consistent with how the Congressional Iraq Study Group has now made an official recommendation that the U.S. ask the Iranians to stabilize Iraq! [45]

Although the Bush administration has made a show of reacting negatively to this recommendation, I believe this is theater: The public fact of the recommendation is making the idea imaginable, preparing the ground for when it will seem inevitable.

As pointed out earlier, Iran already controls Syria, Lebanon, and Hezbollah, so control of Iraq gives it a land corridor all the way to the northern border of Israel.

The true policy aims of a government, in my view, have to be inferred from that government's behavior, not its public statements, because we all know that government officials will say the opposite of what they are doing if it suits their purposes (it is called "diplomacy" and also "propaganda").

During the Iran-Iraq war, the entire Reagan administration said they preferred an Iraqi victory and that they were bitter enemies of Iran, all the while stealing the U.S. taxpayer’s money to arm to the teeth an Iranian regime that slaughtered its own children in "human wave" attacks that launched thousands of youngsters against Iraqi tanks, and that wishes to exterminate the Jews.

Actions speak louder than words. It is best, when producing a political analysis, to leave aside what government officials say they are doing (unless one is making an analysis of propaganda). U.S. officials say they support Israel, but recent U.S. policy has made it much easier for Iran to attack Israel.

Why does the U.S. ruling elite want Iranian dominance in the Middle East?

In my view, because the U.S. ruling elite that determines U.S. foreign policy is not like ordinary Americans -- it has a quite different ideology. This is of course why the U.S. government has to lie to its citizens about what it does: They would not approve.

What is the ideology of the U.S. ruling elite? This was made dramatically clear by historian Christopher Simpson's investigation, published in 1988. [46]

Simpson showed, with a trickle of partially declassified documents belatedly obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (and which reveal but the tip of the iceberg), that almost the entire Nazi war criminal infrastructure had been absorbed by the U.S. government, in secret, after the Second World War, creating U.S. Intelligence with this personnel. When Simpson's book was released, The Washington Post wrote:

"It is no longer necessary -- or possible -- to deny the fact: The U.S. government systematically and deliberately recruited active Nazis by the thousands, rescued them, hired them and relied upon them to serve American interests and purposes in postwar Europe". [47]

Actually, it was tens of thousands of Nazis, and these Nazis became U.S. Intelligence (the C.I.A. and the rest of the intelligence alphabet soup).

The Toronto Star added:

"Many East European Nazi collaborators, leaders of fascist groups and governments in Eastern Europe, and leaders of pro-fascist East European emigre organizations soon became politically active in the States [because they were brought to the U.S. in secret by the C.I.A. and given new identities]...and gained remarkable access to the most powerful intelligence chiefs, politicians, business associations and media moguls in America". [47a]

This is indeed documented in Simpson's book.

The Washington Post and The New York Times tried to apologize for all this, rather than denouncing it as a truly free press should have done. Soon after this, all mention of Simpson's book in the media died completely, and the book has been taken out of circulation.

Since it is U.S. Intelligence that determines U.S. foreign policy, and since it is a nest of Nazis, should we be surprised that U.S. policy has been making it easier and easier for Iran, which denies the Holocaust while loudly calling for another one, to attack the Jewish State?

Perhaps we should be surprised that the U.S. ruling elite absorbed all those Nazis after the war?

Not according to the recent investigations of historian Edwin Black, who in "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race", published in 2003, showed that the dominant ideology in the U.S. ruling class, in the first half of the 20th century, was eugenics. [48]

The eugenics movement preached the biological superiority of Germanic stock, and the natural right of "Germans" to rule everybody else. This ideology was popular in the Western ruling classes because they could claim to be of Germanic stock ("Arians").

German tribes conquered all of Europe when the political structure of the Roman Empire collapsed. The result was that these Germans became the aristocracies all over Western Europe (Visigoths in Spain, Ostrogoths in Lombardy, Franks in France, the Low Countries, and Germany, Anglo-Saxons and then also Normans in Britain, and hence also in the United States, and the Scandinavian tribes in the north -- all Germanic).

The same eugenics ideology preached the extermination of the "mentally retarded", who would be identified employing the "I.Q." tests that these same eugenicists invented (with a series of frauds and cultural biases meant to ensure that the "Arians" -- which is to say, the upper classes -- would come out "smartest").

Hundreds of thousands of humble and innocent U.S. citizens were forcibly sterilized or incarcerated in the first half of the 20th century, by the U.S. government, because the eugenicists were largely in control of it.

The eugenics movement was bankrolled by the great fortunes of the American robber barons, people such as Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, who launched the eugenics movement to attack the working classes who were trying to end what the journalists of the day called "industrial feudalism" only to find themselves attacked, militarily, by the hired guns of Carnegie, Rockefeller, et al.

These robber barons also spent their money taking over government institutions, and used them to grow the eugenics movement all over the world, but spending especially large fortunes growing it in Germany. They handed over the reins of the movement to Adolf Hitler after they had educated him, and precisely at the moment when the Nazi Party was roaring on its way to victory thanks to disastrous economic conditions in Germany that the Western powers had been careful to create.

H.I.R. has published a book that traces much of the history of the eugenics movement down to the present day, paying special attention to the I.Q. fraud and its consequences, which are still pervasive all over U.S. society, where they have been used in the second half of the 20th century to attack blacks, especially. [49]

To conclude, then, the absorption by the U.S. ruling elite of the most successful eugenics movement -- the Nazi war criminal infrastructure -- after the World War is perfectly consistent with the ideology of the U.S. ruling class before the war.

As H.I.R. has shown, it is also perfectly consistent with the behavior of the U.S. ruling elite during the war, because the U.S. government cooperated with the Final Solution, denying refuge to the desperate European Jews, refusing to bomb the death camps or the railroads leading to the death camps, and refusing until the last minute -- and only because ordinary Americans exerted heavy pressure -- to do anything about rescuing any Jews. [50]

Thus, we should not be surprised if U.S. foreign policy since the war, determined as it is by government institutions that supported the attack against the Jews and then absorbed the criminals directly responsible for this, turns out to be anti-Jewish.

In my experience, whoever learns this will raise the question: But why is the U.S. ruling elite against the Jews, in particular? You yourself have asked me...
**************************************

The North American Union is modeled after the Nazi-designed "European Union."

The industrialists supported Hitler, just like the globalists today (all members of the cult of CORPORATISM) are aiding and abetting Germany's Fourth Reich to secure its position throughout the world.

Germany's Fourth Reich Spreads Its Wings Over the World

Is Germany in Danger of Backsliding?

The Intelligence Summit Misses the Mark: the German-Jesuit Threat to World Peace
The Secret Nazis Covet the Temple Mount
Arnold's Office Refuses to Comment